Comments: $19.99 Digital Camera...

There is another model, one that actually looks like a camera, but same company. I got it for X-mas.

www.sharkcamera.com

For poor people like me, who likely would never afford a real digital camera, it's pretty cool.

(I think it basically is a web cam, with some memory added to take screen shots).

Posted by JeremyR at December 27, 2004 09:12 PM

Hell, it's better'n the coal oil powered camera I have!

Posted by Bubba at December 27, 2004 09:18 PM

But it doesn't come close to the image quality of the 35mm Pentax I got at Goodwill for $9.95. Latest pictures I posted of our canine were resampled down to 640 wide after cropping and still look better than that.

Posted by triticale at December 27, 2004 10:54 PM

Hey for $20 bucks beggars can't be choosers. But the picture quality was completely horrible.

Posted by Alexa at December 28, 2004 12:32 AM

This truly is a camera for the masses. Screw high resolution and any other sort of fancy stuff. This is all you need to send a snap shot.

Posted by Paul Phillips at December 28, 2004 01:03 AM

The old photog's saying is, "the best camera is the one you have with you." It may not be Glenn's prized D70, but it does take pix, and is right for the price.

Posted by Rife at December 28, 2004 02:15 AM

hehe - great review! Where do i get one!?

Posted by Darren Rowse at December 28, 2004 02:29 AM

The sub-VGA resolution and lack of true USB is a show-stopper for me. OTOH, competing products are above the $20 impulse buy price point:
Transcend JetFlash (VGA, true USB flash, $60 and up)
Philips KEY0010/17 128MB 2MP USB Key Ring Camera ($125)

Posted by Jon Acheson at December 28, 2004 09:59 AM

The VuPoint I review is definitely a toy, and they make no bones about it. Even the ArcSoft driver is called "Toy Camera".

It would probably make a nice gift for a young child since you wouldn't really care if they broke it or lost it, etc., and maybe it would plant the seeds for a future shutter-bug.

Posted by Jeff Soyer at December 28, 2004 12:44 PM

There are some $39.95 cameras but not "steady stock" so to speak. See, for example, http://www.softwareandstuff.com/CES10529.html which is a Vivitar 1.3MP deal. It's OK for horsing around... certainly better than the 19.95 toy. While it's got a 1.8" LCD, "Fixed focus f/2.8 lens" says it all :-) They do take Compact Flash memory cards, though.

:Cheers.

Posted by Filipg at December 28, 2004 05:49 PM

I have a similar cheapass camera, and looking at the specs, there's one GLARING problem they share.

The 16 megs of RAM here? They're SDRAM, not flash.

Which means if your battery dies, you lose your pictures. And also it's continually draining battery life, keeping the RAM refreshed.

This is why my cheapass SiPix camera has never gotten used. If I'd know it wasn't flash, I never would have bought it.

Posted by Sigivald at December 28, 2004 06:57 PM

The old photog's saying is, 'the best camera is the one you have with you.'

That's pretty much what I was thinking (a .380 in the pocket is better than a .45 in the safe).

I've been shopping for a decent camera phone and, admittedly, the indoor shot of the cat appears to have come out clearer than what most camera phones will produce.

Posted by 356 at December 30, 2004 05:13 PM


Comments close down on posts after seven days and then the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" are currently banned as well. Another common bounce is any word containing the string "cialis" which means words such as socialism will be rejected. Try putting a hyphen into a word like that.


Entire site contents (written/photo) not credited to others is (C) Copyright 2002-2007 by Jeff Soyer. All rights reserved.