Definitely the AWB. And the studies by the CDC, NIJ, and NRC that conclude gun laws don't correlate with crime (yet they spin that to say ccw doesn't decrease crime).
My $0.02.
Posted by SayUncle at December 22, 2004 08:56 AMFollowing in Uncle's vein, the DOJ memo stating that 2A protects an individual right.
Then there's the whole kerfuffle over the DC Gun ban. Esp., I think, the crap between the Cato and NRA suits. Seegars v. Ashcroft is the NRA-backed suit, IIRC. Triggerfinger.org has a ton of stuff on it. The Cato-backed suit I don't have a good memory on.
Liability. Beretta winning, for the 3rd time, in the liability lawsuit filed against it. But, the 9th reinstated a lawsuit against Glock. And liability legislation failed in Congress -- because of the AWB. A victory in Chicago: tinyurl.com/5fw3a - a victory for Ruger: tinyurl.com/59jfh Then there's Bushmaster settling on the Malvo (other guys name?) shootings. And Bryco tinyurl.com/5xuka
tinyurl.com/5tles US v. Stewart. OK, is hasn't been heard, but the fact that the Supremes granted cert. is pretty big.
California. Yeah, just California ... for all their moonbat thinking.
Angel Shemaya selling KABA to SAF/CCRKBA
tinyurl.com/5cppu The Oshkosh searches/confiscations. Hmm, dunno how that ended up.
10th Circuit says no individual right: tinyurl.com/7xkgm
AWBs in the states following sunset of natl. AWB. Pennsylvania, ???
More states get CCW, Ohio and ???
Posted by jed at December 23, 2004 09:36 PM