Today's (spit) New York Times had a very nearly identical op-ed as well.
If they're both upset about this bill, we must be doing something right.
oh the link.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/28/opinion/28thu4.html?
Lying? Well, that's un-Christian and un-science.
Posted by SayUncle at July 28, 2005 09:34 AMIt's no surprise on the nearly identical op-ed/"news" stories. They are both parroting a Brady Center press release (see URL).
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=50943
MSM research a story? Understand an issue? Why, that takes effort!
Posted by Tom Frank at July 28, 2005 11:20 AMthat, and the lie that 200 guns mysteriously left Bullseye. Once again see here: Brian Borgelt
The numbers jumped around wildly during the frenzy of media coverage that followed the sniper arrests in October 2002. The rumors said 340 guns were missing, then 262, then 238, then 160 and finally 78 – a number cited by the ATF.
Posted by ben at July 29, 2005 12:45 AM*grumble*
I actually got a response from my House of Reps critter (Olver if it matters) to my request he vote for(!) the "Protection of..." act.
Scumbag's response was right out of VPC literature. To paraphrase: This bill will prevent people from suing if they are REALLY injured. Bull. Sounds to me like he hasn't even bothered to read it. But our congress-critters are KNOWN for that.
*spit*
Peet in WMass...